Wednesday, July 30, 2025

Turkey develops ‘most powerful’ 970kg thermobaric bomb

 Turkey has developed a “most powerful” thermobaric bomb capable of blasting below 90m of rock and earth, according to state media.

The 970kg Gazap (Ghost) and Hayalet (Wrath) weapons were developed by the Turkish defence ministry and unveiled this week.

Thermobaric weapons, sometimes referred to as vacuum bombs, fuel-air munitions or aerosol bombs, use oxygen mixed with fuel to create a high-temperature explosion.

A Turkish official said the Hayalet bomb was dropped onto an island and was able to blast through 90m of rock and earth.

“The island is 160 meters wide. After detonation, we detected effects across the full width and even on the rear side," they said.

"The explosion, which normally takes 25ms (milliseconds), was timed to 240ms, making it more destructive," the official added.

The weapon can be dropped from a US-made F-16 fighter jet, according to state media. Russia has also used thermobaric bombs in Ukraine.

In 2007, Moscow announced what it called the “father of all bombs”, claiming it was four times more powerful than Washington’s equivalent.

The American 21,600lb weapon is also known as the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast Bomb. While they are not used for precision strikes, thermobaric missiles can be deployed for clearing stretches of ground.

Thermobaric weapons use oxygen from the surrounding air to create a high temperature explosion. They also have blast effects that last longer than a conventional explosion.

In 2024, it was revealed that Russia started churning out thermobaric drones. They were able to create a vortex of high pressure and heat that can penetrate thick walls.

They suck out all the oxygen in their path, and have a fearsome reputation because of the injuries inflicted even outside the initial blast site: Collapsed lungs, crushed eyeballs, brain damage, according to the AP.

The Turkish bomb was unveiled at the 17th edition of the six-day IDEF defence fair, which started on Tuesday, and is being held at the Istanbul Fair Center.

Rotting equipment and fleeing staff: Partisans expose state of Russian military hospital in Crimea (photos)

 Partisans have scouted the territory of a Russian military unit in Sevastopol. A special forces medical detachment is stationed there, which is currently experiencing a personnel crisis, the partisan movement Atesh reports.

"As of now, the unit is in decline - the territory is neglected, and the equipment is rotting under the sun. Security measures have completely failed - a daily guard unit is present on-site, but they mostly sleep or start drinking closer to the evening," Atesh claims.

According to the partisans, the Russian command likely lacks the resources to supply and staff the unit. Because of this, it is expected to be disbanded in the near future.

Local Russian soldiers are already looking for places to transfer in order to continue serving in Crimea without having to go to the areas of active hostilities in Ukraine.

Earlier, Atesh agents discovered that Russian forces are actively preparing for a massive drone strike on Crimea. In addition, partisans carried out a successful sabotage operation behind enemy lines in the temporarily occupied territory of the Kherson region.

Previously, ATESH agents also conducted reconnaissance at an important defense plant in Russia's St Petersburg.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Trump says Obama committed treason. This is Alice in Wonderland-style justice

 Almost every American knows that in our legal system, people accused of crimes are presumed innocent. The burden is on the government to overcome that presumption and prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Those simple but powerful maxims were once a source of national pride. They distinguished the United States from countries where government officials and political leaders branded the opponents guilty before they were charged with a crime or brought to trial.

In Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union, the Alice-in-Wonderland world of “sentence first-verdict afterwards” came to life in infamous show trials. Those trials lacked all the requisites of fairness. Evidence was manufactured to demonstrate the guilt of the regime’s enemies. Show trials told the story the government wanted told and were designed to signal that anyone, innocent or not, could be convicted of a crime against the state.

So far, at least, this country has avoided Stalinesque show trials. But the logic of the show trial was very much on display this week in the Oval Office.

In a now-familiar scene, during a meeting with the Philippines president, Ferdinand Marcos Jr, Donald Trump went off script. He turned a reporter’s question about the unfolding Jeffrey Epstein scandal into an occasion to say that former president Barack Obama had committed “treason” by interfering in the 2016 presidential election.

“He’s guilty,” Trump asserted, “This was treason. This was every word you can think of.”

Speaking after the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, released a report on alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election, the president said: “Obama was trying to lead a coup. And it was with Hillary Clinton.”

Republican congressmen and senators, including the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, who investigated allegations of Obama’s involvement five years ago, found nothing to support them. But none of that mattered to the president on Tuesday.

As Trump put it: “Whether it’s right or wrong, it’s time to go after people. Obama’s been caught directly.” Not hiding his motives, Trump said: “It’s time to start after what they did to me.”

Guilt first. Charges, trials and other legal niceties come later.

This is American justice, Trump-style. He wants no part of the long and storied tradition in which presidents kept an arms-length relationship with the justice department and did not interfere with its decisions about whether and whom to prosecute for crimes.

What Trump said about Obama is, the New York Times notes, “a stark example of his campaign of retribution against an ever-growing list of enemies that has little analogue in American history”. Putting one of his predecessors on trial also would take some of the sting out of Trump’s own dubious distinction of being the only former president to have been convicted of a felony.

Some may be tempted to write off the president’s latest Oval Office pronouncements as an unhinged rant or only an effort to distract attention from Trump’s Epstein troubles. But that would be a mistake.

A recent article by the neuroscientist Tali Sharot and the law professor Cass Sunstein helps explain why. That article is titled: “Will We Habituate to the Decline of Democracy?”

Sharot and Sunstein argue that the US is on the cusp of a dangerous moment in its political history. They say that we can understand why by turning to neuroscience, not to political science.

Neuroscience teaches us that “people are less likely to respond to or even notice gradual changes. That is largely due to habituation, which is the brain’s tendency to react less and less to things that are constant or that change slowly.”

In politics, “when democratic norms are violated repeatedly, people begin to adjust. The first time a president refuses to concede an election, it’s a crisis. The second time, it’s a controversy. By the third time, it may be just another headline. Each new breach of democratic principles … politicizing the justice system … feels less outrageous than the last.”

Americans must resist that tendency. To do so, Sharot and Sunstein argue, we need “to see things not in light of the deterioration of recent years but in light of our best historical practices, our highest ideals, and our highest aspirations”.

In the realm of respect for the rule of law and the presumption of innocence, we can trace those practices, ideals and aspirations back to 1770, when John Adams, a patriot, practicing lawyer and later the second president of the United States, agreed to defend British soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre.

Adams did so because he believed that everyone, no matter how reprehensible their act, was entitled to a defense. That principle meant that people needed to learn to withhold judgment, to respect evidence and to hear both sides of a story before making up their minds.

That was a valuable lesson for those who would later want to lead our constitutional republic, as well as for its citizens. The trial of the British soldiers turned out, as the author Christopher Klein writes, to be “the first time reasonable doubt had ever been used as a standard”.

Fast forward to 1940, and the memorable speech of the attorney general, Robert Jackson, to a gathering of United States attorneys. What he said about their role might also be said about the president’s assertions about Obama.

Jackson observed that US attorneys had “more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America”. A prosecutor, he explained, “can have citizens investigated and, if he is that kind of person, he can have this done to the tune of public statements and veiled or unveiled intimations … The prosecutor can order arrests … and on the basis of his one-sided presentation of the facts, can cause the citizen to be indicted and held for trial.”

Sound familiar?

The president is not a prosecutor, but since he has returned to power, President Trump has behaved and encouraged those in the justice department to ignore Jackson’s warnings that a prosecutor should focus on “cases that need to be prosecuted” rather than “people that he thinks he should get”. Targeting people, not crimes, means that the people prosecuted will be those who are “unpopular with the predominant or governing group” or are “attached to the wrong political views, or [are] personally obnoxious to or in the way of the prosecutor himself.

Jackson restated a long-cherished American ideal, namely that those with the power to ruin lives and reputations should seek “truth and not victims” and serve “the law and not factional purposes”.

Since then, presidents of both parties, in even the most controversial cases and those involving allies or opponents, have heeded Jackson’s warnings. They have said nothing about pending cases, let alone announcing that it’s time “to go after” people.

But no more. The justice department seems ready and willing to do the president’s bidding, even though there is no evidence that Obama did anything wrong in regard to the 2016 election. In addition, he may have immunity from criminal prosecution for anything he did in his official capacity.

Trump’s attack on the “traitorous” Obama may be predictable. But it should not be acceptable to any of us.

Sharot and Sunstein get it right when they say, “To avoid habituating ourselves to the torrent of President Trump’s assaults on democracy and the rule of law, we need to keep our best practices, ideals, and aspirations firmly in view what we’ve done.” We need “to compare what is happening today not to what happened yesterday or the day before, but to what we hope will happen tomorrow”.

To get to that world, it is important to recall the words of John Adams and Robert Jackson and work to give them life again.

Austin Sarat, William Nelson Cromwell professor of jurisprudence and political science at Amherst College, is the author or editor of more than 100 books, including Gruesome Spectacles: Botched Executions and America’s Death Penalty


Luke Shaw ready to leave Man United after 11 years as preferred destination revealed

 After more than a decade at Old Trafford, Luke Shaw appears prepared to end his Manchester United career.

The 30-year-old defender is reportedly open to exploring opportunities elsewhere, including potential moves to Saudi Arabia.

Despite having two years remaining on his current deal worth £150,000 weekly, the left-back recognises that his playing opportunities may become increasingly limited.

According to The Sun, Shaw is ready to consider offers from interested parties.

PA

Luke Shaw is ready to leave Manchester United after 11 years at Old Trafford

The England international has been with the Red Devils since 2014, accumulating 388 appearances for both club and country during his career.

His potential exit would mark the conclusion of an 11-year association with the Manchester club, having joined from Southampton in 2014.

Competition for his position has intensified significantly under manager Ruben Amorim's system. The Portuguese coach can now choose from multiple options at left-back, including Diogo Dalot and January acquisition Patrick Dorgu.

Adding to Shaw's concerns is the emergence of Diego Leon, an 18-year-old prospect who arrived from Paraguayan side Cerro Porteno for £3.3million.

PA

Luke Shaw joined Manchester United from Southampton back in the summer transfer window of 2014

The teenager made an immediate impression during his debut appearance.

Following Leon's performance in the goalless draw against Leeds, Amorim praised the youngster's potential.

"He did really well. He's learning things, he's powerful, he's going to be a very good player," the manager stated.

This increased competition means Shaw faces a battle to secure regular first-team football at Old Trafford.

The full-back's fitness record presents a significant concern, with the defender suffering 28 separate injuries throughout his United tenure.

A devastating double leg fracture in 2015 kept him sidelined for nearly 10 months, representing just one of many setbacks.

The left-back has missed almost five years of football due to various injury problems since arriving at Old Trafford. His availability issues continued last term when he managed only seven Premier League matches.

Throughout the previous campaign, Shaw battled separate knee, calf and muscle injuries that severely restricted his involvement.

These persistent fitness struggles have prevented him from establishing consistent runs in the team, undermining his ability to secure a regular starting position.

Shaw expressed remorse about United's disappointing campaign when speaking to BBC Sport in May.

"We're very sorry for what they have had to go through this season. Like I said, it's been nowhere near good enough, and I can only apologise for that," he said.

The defender questioned whether the squad met the standards required at Old Trafford.

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Soccer-We have the weapons to beat England, says Italy's Soncin

 Italy scraped through the group stage and needed a last-minute goal to beat Norway in the last eight, but coach Andrea Soncin believes his side have what it takes to beat reigning champions England in their Women's Euro 2025 semi-final on Tuesday. 

Soncin and his squad have spoken of their big dreams at this tournament and how overcoming adversity has brought them closer together, and they are confident they can beat Sarina Wiegman's side and secure a first appearance in the final since 1997. 

"We have done very well in this event. There is a lot of courage, awareness and serenity. That is what has accompanied us throughout the whole event," Soncin told reporters on Monday. 

"We are convinced that we have the weapons to win the game, and we have the utmost respect for the quality of the English players and their international experience."

England survived a heart-stopping penalty shootout that saw only five of 14 spot-kicks scored as they beat Sweden 3-2 in their quarter-final, and Soncin said that it was virtually impossible to replicate the pressure of a shootout in training. 

"I don't believe that there is a specific way to train the penalties in a training session because there is the emotional aspect and also the physical aspect that come into play, but especially the emotional aspect which is not the same during a training session," he explained. 

"Of course we, like everybody, we try to ... also train penalties so that we're ready for everything, our objective is to reach the final."

Soncin and Italy defender Cecilia Salvai, who also attended the media conference, offered their support to England's Jess Carter, who has withdrawn from social media due to the racial abuse she has received during the tournament. 

"It is a cultural campaign (against racism), a cultural battle we have to fight all together. I don't know whether taking the knee is enough to change this, but for sure there is maximum solidarity from our side, we are ready to take part in any campaign to avoid this abuse," Soncin said. 

"I hope she can play this game 100 percent because this is a semi-final, so I hope she can try to detach a bit from this episode. Of course, she's not the first one who's been victim of this abuse and we have the greatest solidarity for her," Salvai added.

Chelsea transfer news: Blues plot swap deal bid to sign Cole Palmer's best friend

 Chelsea remain interested in signing Aston Villa star Morgan Rogers and they are reportedly planning on including three players in a swap deal bid for the England international.

Rogers, 22, enjoyed a breakout season under Unai Emery last year as he established himself as one of the Premier League’s most dangerous attackers and an indispensable figure at Villa Park.

He scored 14 goals and provided 15 assists in 54 appearances across all competitions last term, and he started 37 of Aston Villa’s 38 English top flight matches, with his only absence coming due to suspension.

As a result, Emery is determined to retain the England star and Villa are open to offering him an improved contract in a bid to ward off interest from Chelsea, as per The Daily Mail.

Despite this, Enzo Maresca’s side have identified Rogers as a key transfer target following the sale of Noni Madueke to Arsenal, and they are set to submit a surprise swap deal offer that includes three defenders.

That is according to CaughtOffside, who claim that Chelsea are planning on offering Benoit Badiashile, Trevoh Chalobah and Tosin Adarabioyo to Aston Villa in order to reduce the potential outlay on Rogers.

The report states that Villa will demand a fee of up to €80 million for the 22-year-old and Chelsea are reportedly eager to include Badiasile, Chalobah and Tosin in the deal as they look to trim down Maresca’s squad.

Morgan Rogers: Cole Palmer’s best friend?

Cole Palmer is Chelsea’s poster boy and he recently claimed that he can’t be separated from the aforementioned Tosin at Stamford Bridge.

However, he is equally close with Rogers. The pair were great friends during their time in Manchester City’s academy and Palmer even copied his ‘cold’ celebration from the Aston Villa star.

Furthermore, he admitted that he calls Rogers on FaceTime “every day” during an interview with Sky Sports in early 2025.

As a result, Palmer would no doubt endorse the signing of Rogers, with Chelsea viewing the Aston Villa attacker as a player capable of covering multiple positions across the forward line.

Saturday, July 19, 2025

Chelsea offer Felix and Nkunku in exchange for £207k-per-week forward

 Chelsea are seriously weighing up the prospect of player exchanges, to both trim their bloated squad and reinforce Enzo Maresca's own options.

Fresh off their impressive Club World Cup campaign in the USA, where they won six of their seven matches en route to a statement 3-0 win over PSG in the final, BlueCo continue their attempts to reshape the side ahead of a vital Premier League season

Chelsea are under some pressure from UEFA to sell players after being fined for breaching FFP rules recently (Kaveh Solhekol), but Maresca is believed to personally want more attacking options as well (Simon Phillips).

As a solution to Chelsea's need for player sales, and their desire to bring in more signings after a trio of deals for Liam Delap, Jamie Gittens and Joao Pedro, it is reported that 'unofficial swap deals' are being pondered at Stamford Bridge.

"The Blues are still weighing up a number of new targets in attack and other areas," wrote journalist Simon Phillips on Substack this week.

"Unofficial swap deals are something Chelsea and other clubs have done a lot of lately to help balance the books of both clubs and keep within PSR rules. They make sense really and help both clubs and help deals get done. They aren’t swap deals as such, more like favour for a favour separate deals.

"Chelsea are still weighing up some opportunities for this. And although my top source is still hearing nothing at all on Alejandro Garnacho to Chelsea, something that has been backed up by Fabrizio Romano this week who says there has been no bid or even talks between Chelsea and United for Garnacho as of now, our source does also say that the only way it would happen is part of a ‘swap’ deal."

Interestingly, Phillips also reported in the aforementioned Substack update that a player who could leave Cobham, in exchange for someone like Garnacho, is versatile attacker Christopher Nkunku.

The Frenchman still faces an uncertain future, despite impressing at the CWC, and has been told that he'll only have a squad role next season.

Meanwhile, Joao Felix is widely expected to leave and has held talks over a return to boyhood club Benfica (Standard Sport).

Chelsea offer João Félix and Christopher Nkunku in exchange for Rodrygo

Now, as per Spanish news website Real Madrid Confidential, Chelsea are continuing to express an interest in £207,000-per-week Los Blancos forward Rodrygo.

Reports earlier this week claimed that Maresca's side were plotting to use Nicolas Jackson in a potential swap for the Brazil international, and now RMC claim that Chelsea have proposed Nkunku and Felix in exchange for Rodrygo.

The 24-year-old is yet to make a final decision about leaving Real this summer, after scarcely being used by new manager Xabi Alonso at the Club World Cup, but it appears west London is emerging as a serious potential landing spot amid links to Arsenal, Liverpool and Man City.

Rodrygo bagged 14 goals and 11 assists in all competitions last season, with England midfielder Jude Bellingham calling him the most "underrated" player in their squad

Jadon Sancho Responds After Fan Calls Him 'Worst Signing in Man Utd History'

 In 2021, Jadon Sancho was one of the most highly coveted young players in world football. The Englishman had burst onto the scene with Borussia Dortmund a few years prior and managed to quickly establish himself as one of the best players in the Bundesliga, despite his tender years.

His form for Dortmund, which saw him score 53 times and record 67 assists in 158 games for the club, attracted the attention of Manchester United and he went on to sign for the Red Devils for a £73 million fee.

Just 21 years old at the time, Sancho arrived with a lofty reputation and he was expected to light up the Premier League. However, that has not been the case. Fast-forward four years and Sancho is almost certain to depart the club this summer following an unsuccessful loan spell at Chelsea.

The Englishman is one of five United players that have expressed their desire to leave the club this summer and is now training away from the rest of the squad in pre-season.

Jadon Sancho Called 'Worst Man United Signing Ever' by Fan

Sancho saw the post and has to respond

During his four years at Old Trafford, Sancho scored just 12 times and recorded six assists in 83 matches for the club. That is a very poor return for a player that cost £73m.

With the 25-year-old nearing the exit door at Old Trafford, a fan of the club has vented their frustration at how his United career panned out. Responding to one of Sancho's recent posts on Instagram, per SPORTbible, the supporter called him 'the worst signing in the greatest club's history' before adding 'you're a stain on the shade of red that we wear. Good riddance.'

Sancho saw the post and couldn't resist responding. The 25-year-old decided against saying anything rash and instead replied: "Have a good day bro."

Sancho Closing In On Move Away

The Englishman looks set to move to Italy

United have been desperate to get Sancho's wages off their books this summer. The Camberwell-born winger has just one-year remaining on his £250,000-per-week contract and they need to cash in or risk losing him for free next summer.

And, according to Football Italia, he could complete a move to Juventus in the coming weeks with United ready to lower their asking price. Sancho is eager to complete a switch to the Old Lady and it's been reported that United are willing to accept their £15m offer, a fraction of what the English club paid for him four years ago.

Transfer expert Alfredo Pedullà said of the deal, per CaughtOffside: "Negotiations are progressing well. The offer might already be enough. Sancho has once again reiterated his desire to wait for Juventus and has urged them to speed things up.

“Manchester United are cooperating and want to resolve the situation. They’ve already backed away from the original €25m evaluation. Of course, it’s not all offer, so caution is still needed but Juventus are picking up pace, heading straight toward Sancho.”

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Trump vs MAGA: Epstein Files spark unprecedented division between president and his base that thinks he’s ‘out of touch

 A growing number of President Donald Trump’s devoted followers are calling him “out of touch” and “misleading” after he encouraged people to move on from the Epstein Files.

For years, right-wing influencers have circulated theories online about the government’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his death in federal prison, perpetuating claims that a ring of high-profile, powerful individuals helped cover up the convicted pedophile’s actions and ensure he never stood trial.

But last week’s Justice Department and FBI memo shut down many of those theories, including the existence of a “client list,” and disappointed many Trump supporters who refused to believe the absence of bombshell revelations.

Tension between the president and parts of his base was palpable this weekend after Trump told people to “not waste Time and Energy of Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about” in a Truth Social post.

“Trump is very out of touch right now… Really sad to see,” Anthony Sabatini, a Florida state politician and Trump supporter, wrote on X. “RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES NOW!”

Liz Wheeler, a conservative political commentator, said: “Trump is massively misreading his base on this one. It could cost him the midterms.”

“No one is believing the Epstein coverup, @realDonaldTrump. This will be part of your legacy. There’s still time to change it!” Mike Cernovich, a right-wing influencer known as “Cernovich” on X, told Trump.

Wheeler, Cernovich, and other conservative influencers were invited to the White House earlier this year and granted exclusive access to the first document drop in the Epstein Files. However, it was quickly revealed that much of the information contained in the binders was already in the public domain.

But the group, and others in the rightwing media sphere, remained hopeful as one of Trump’s campaign promises had been to release all information related to the Epstein investigation.

When he took office, Trump tapped Kash Patel to serve as FBI director and Dan Bongino to serve as deputy FBI director. Patel and Bongino, former conservative activists and media personalities, had been among the loudest voices alleging a cover-up in the Epstein investigation before taking up their government posts.

Trump’s Attorney General Pam Bondi also accused the Southern District of New York of hiding information not previously known about Epstein, and insinuated that a “client list” was part of files on her desk to be reviewed. (Last week, she clarified she meant the files as a whole were on her desk, and that she was not referring to a client list specifically.)

The DOJ/FBI memo concluded that there was no client list, that Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019, and that no further investigation into third parties was warranted.

The conclusions set off a firestorm of criticism on the right.

“It’s a shame that a lot of good people are getting attacked as a result of the order to protect the pedos in the Epstein Files. This isn’t going away,” wrote Rogan O’Handley, known as “DC Draino” on X.

Laura Loomer, a close ally of Trump, blamed Bondi for the Epstein Files fallout and called on the president to fire her.

“We were promised transparency on the Jeffrey Epstein files. Instead, we got Pam Blondi @PamBondi, a Fox News addict waving around a binder of heavily redacted and recycled documents like it's some sort of bombshell,” Loomer wrote on X.

Trump doubled down on his support for Bondi and Bongino over the weekend but that did little to quell some supporters’ anger.

“Trump’s persuasive power over his base, especially during his first term, was almost magical. Calling out obvious mistakes he made would get you an ass chewing. ‘Trust the plan!’ The reaction on Epstein should thus be startling to him. No one is buying it. No one is dropping it,” Cernovich added.

And at the Student Action Summit, hosted by the conservative group Turning Point USA this past weekend, there seemed little interest in letting the matter drop, NBC News reported.

Conservative podcaster Brandon Tatum shared his own theory to the crowd of young conservatives, and added: “I don’t think they’re telling us the truth about Epstein.”

Mbeumo to Man Utd in doubt as Brentford ‘almost certainly rule out’ double exit

 Manchester United have been dealt a blow in their protracted bid to sign Bryan Mbeumo from Brentford this summer as one Bees sale ‘would almost certainly rule out’ another.

The Red Devils have made just two signings so far this summer with Matheus Cunha arriving from Wolves after they triggered his £62.5m release clause, and Diego Leon joining from Paraguayan side Cerro Porteno for £3.3m.

Ruben Amorim and the United board want widespread changes but are limited by their transfer budget as they struggle to find buyers for Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho, Antony and Alejandro Garnacho.

Club chiefs have been fully focused on trying to secure the signing of Mbeumo from Brentford and have had two offers rejected for the Cameroon international, with the Bees holding out for £65m+ for their prized asset, who got 20 goals and eight assists in the Premier League last season and has made it clear he wants the move to Old Trafford.

Transfer expert Fabrizio Romano continues to insist the ‘deal is on’ as club-to-club talks continue and revealed a boost for United on Monday.

Romano wrote on X: ‘EXCL: Brentford are showing initial interest in Omari Hutchinson as possible replacement for Bryan Mbeumo in case of exit with Man Utd on it. Brentford appreciate Hutchinson but no club to club talks yet with Ipswich Town.’

But the long-drawn-out negotiations for Mbeumo may come back to bite United as Sky Sports claim one of Tottenham, Newcastle or Nottingham Forest could effectively hijack the transfer.

The Premier League trio are all interested in Mbeumo’s forward partner Yoane Wissa, with Forest’s £20m bid rejected last week after they saw a £22m bid rejected in January.

Nuno Espirito Santo’s side were reportedly told they need £50m for the Congo striker, who got 19 Premier League goals and five assists last term under Thomas Frank, who now wants him at Tottenham, while Eddie Howe wants another striker to compete and rotate with Alexander Isak.

It’s claimed Brentford are ‘highly unlikely to sell both Mbeumo and Wissa’ and that ‘whichever club agrees a deal for one would almost certainly rule out the sale of the other’.

Missing out on Mbeumo would be a huge blow for United, and Brentford director of football Phil Giles revealed earlier this month that the forward would be “happy to stay” if the Red Devils can’t get a deal across the line.

“There is significant interest in Bryan. His current preference has been well publicised,” Giles said.

“He had an unbelievable season, and we expected interest in him. From what I understand, he is also, if needs be, happy to stay at Brentford next year as well.

“We’ve spoken to Bryan and his representatives. It’s not a given that he’s going to depart this summer.

“If we get the right offer, there is the potential for a deal to be done, but there is only so much we can say now on that.”

Thursday, July 10, 2025

Man Utd to land financial boost as 'bargain' they let slip set for £55m transfer

 Manchester United are in line for a welcome financial boost as a result of Anthony Elanga's proposed £55million transfer to Newcastle, with the Red Devils poised to bank in excess of £5m.

Elanga, 23, joined the academy ranks at United as a teenager before breaking into the first-team and then being sold on to Forest in the summer of 2023. He has excelled since moving to The City Ground and, after amassing 17 goal contributions for Forest last season, is now on the verge of another move.

Newcastle are long-term admirers of the Sweden international and have been chasing his signature for weeks in their search for a new right winger.

And with a deal now agreed in principle, United stand to profit from a clause they inserted in the initial deal that took Elanga to Forest two years ago.

As per ESPN, United stand to bank a percentage of any profit Forest make on the amount they signed Elanga for, which is understood to be around £15m.

The Magpies want to strengthen ahead of the 2025-26 campaign after qualifying for the Champions League again and Elanga will give Eddie Howe more frontline options.

Ironically, United's interest in Bryan Mbeumo - and the player's subsequent preference for a move to Old Trafford - drove Newcastle back to Elanga in their search for a new attacker.

Mbeumo is a wanted man after breaking the 20-goal barrier in the Premier League last season but only has eyes for Manchester United. A deal has yet to be finalised for the Cameroon star, though, despite weeks of talks with Brentford.

Elanga's departure from Old Trafford was not a universally popular decision and United's decision to let the winger go was criticised by Jamie Redknapp some months after the deal was done.

Speaking ahead of a match between Forest and United back in December of 2023, Redknapp said on Sky Sports of Elanga: "If you look at the current climate of players and how much they cost, he looks like a real bargain. Antony on the other hand, has cost four times as much and he [Elanga] gives you more opportunities going forward, he scores and makes more goals.

"Whenever you play against your former side, you want to show them. He will look forward to going up against [Diogo] Dalot today and taking him on."

Panicked Putin signs ‘urgent' law allowing foreigners into Russian army as 100k killed

 Vladimir Putin has signed a new law making it possible for foreigners to enlist in the Russian military. The Russian news service TASS reports that stateless individuals and people from other countries will be able to sign contracts and serve until the end of the "mobilisation period", the termination of martial law or the end of the war in Ukraine. It was legislated "in order to take urgent additional measures to restaff the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation," an explanatory note to the order read.

Earlier this year, Volodymyr Zelensky claimed that 155 Chinese soldiers were fighting for Russia. Ukraine's military said in April that it had captured two of them. Chinese government spokesman Lin Jian said at the time that they "advise relevant parties to correctly and soberly understand China's role and not to make irresponsible remarks". He added: "China is neither the creator nor a party to the Ukrainian crisis. We are a staunch supporter and active promoter of the peaceful resolution of the crisis."

The ISW reported on July 4 that Russia's military command is "modernising Russian training grounds to include motorcycle tracks and reportedly intends to purchase up to 200,000 Chinese-made motorcycles for the Russian military".

CNN reported on July 2 that a Ukrainian intelligence assessment stated that Kim Jog Un will likely send an additional 25,000 to 30,000 soldiers to Russia in the coming months.

It added that there is a "great possibility" that the foreign forces will enhance Russian forces in Ukraine, including "during large-scale offensive operations", the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) added.

Russia has suffered 1,028,610 casulaties in Ukraine since the beginning of its full-scale invasion in February 2022, the General Staff of Ukraine's Armed Forces reported on July 8, according to the Kyiv Independent.

The BBC reported in May that more than 100,000 have been killed. But the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has stated that Ukrainian fatality rates are also substantial, with between 60,000 and 100,000 soldiers killed, and 400,000 casualties overall.

Experts have also assessed that Russian officials are "concealing population data in an attempt to obfuscate Russia's ongoing demographic problems, and the omission of demographic data in Rosstat's reports likely also aim to obscure the Russian military's high personnel loss rates".

Monday, July 7, 2025

Novak Djokovic plays God-mode tennis to dismantle friend Miomir Kecmanovic

 Novak Djokovic last lost a match at Wimbledon to anyone other than Carlos Alcaraz in 2017. And even that defeat, to the Czech player Tomas Berdych, was down to an elbow injury that forced him to retire.

It is a staggering run, stretching over eight years and 45 matches. Yet rarely has Djokovic played as well as he did here against his fellow Serb Miomir Kecmanovic on Saturday night. Over the course of three destructive sets, Djokovic hit 60 winners to just 19 unforced errors as he put a masterclass of spin and subtlety, guile and laser-like power, to a wildly appreciative Centre Court.

Certainly Kecmanovic, the world No 49, had no answers. Then again, with the seven-time champion in this form, how many would? If anything the 6-3, 6-0, 6-4 score could have been even more emphatic.

Victory left Djokovic beaming, especially when he was told that he had just become only the third player in Wimbledon singles’ history to enter the 100-win club, joining Martina Navratilova and Roger Federer. “It sounds very nice,” Djokovic said. “Particularly at this age, I am still going strong and still trying to compete with the younger players. I’m doing some slides and some splits on the court and am pushing myself to the limit.

“Wimbledon is a dream tournament. And any history I make at my favourite tournament, I am blessed.”

Initially we looked to be in for a contest of sorts. Djokovic started with an ace and won the first three points of the match. But Kecmanovic retaliated with a textbook drop shot and a forehand winner before forcing deuce.

It set the early tone. Djokovic pressing, but with his opponent determined to resist. But, all of a sudden, the dam broke at 4-3. It came after one of the rallies of the tournament, a 14-shot thriller that twirled into life with an immaculate Djokovic drop shot.

It led to the players exchanging diving volleys at the net, before a lob volley by Djokovic had his opponent scrambling backwards. Somehow Kecmanovic got to the ball, and the subsequent smash, and even looked to be winning the point with a pass. But while Djokovic turned 38 in May, he is as spry as he ever was. Somehow he was able to launch his body towards the ball, Boris Becker-style, and hit a winning backhand volley.

As the Centre Crowd crowd rose to applaud, Kecmanovic stood at the net smiling before playfully hitting a ball at Djokovic, his good friend and Davis Cup teammate. But it also seemed to implant a thought in his head: how the hell am I going to beat this guy?

Three points later Kecmanovic lost his serve, and Djokovic was serving for the first set which he duly took.

“It was kind of like an ecstasy, to be honest, in that moment,” said Djokovic when asked about the rally. “I was super, super happy. It came at a really important moment, as well. 4-3, deuce, long point. We were both running around each other, around the whole court. Then just that diving backhand volley down the line passing shot. Can’t wait to see the highlights!

“I was pumped for that one,” he added. “Obviously I’m not diving as much on the courts. Obviously the only surface where you would dive is grass. But I’m not used to it as much. So these unique, rare moments are really something you cherish. Of course, if you win a point like this in an important moment, it is even better.”

It had been a startlingly impressive opening, but it turned out Djokovic was just getting started. He raced through the second set in just 24 minutes, hitting 13 winners and just two unforced errors.

When Kecmanovic finally stemmed the bleeding by holding his serve at the start of the third set, he felt compelled to raise his arms in triumph. But Djokovic continued to play God-mode tennis, and when a lob volley put him 5-1 up it looked like nothing could interrupt his flow.

That wasn’t quite the case as a rowdy Centre Court crowd briefly distracted him. After losing three games in a row, he recovered his composure to book a last-16 match against Alex de Minaur, who beat August Holmgren in straight sets.

“I enjoyed myself very much, except the last couple of games,” said Djokovic. “A bit of tension at the end, things got a bit complicated. It is never easy playing a friend and compatriot.”

True. But over one hour and 48 minutes of engrossing tennis, Djokovic showed he means business. And while the bookies might think this year’s tournament is a near coin-toss between Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner, write him off at your peril.

Ukraine turns to machines to spare troops from drone-infested ‘grey zone’

 The crack of a Ukrainian howitzer splits the air, mingling with the rumble of thunder. Then there is another sharp blast, followed by a sound like shredding paper as a Himars missile roars overhead.

Unfazed by the orchestra of war, a Ukrainian electrician continues repairing a power cable severed during Russian shelling.

But as he works, a less familiar sound signals a new threat: the insistent beep of a drone monitor. Even here – in a village on the outskirts of the front line in the eastern city of Pokrovsk – Russian surveillance and strike drones now maintain a constant presence.

“Keep your eyes on the sky and listen,” says Vitaliy Asinenko, a regional chief at DTEK Donetsk Grids, looking up at the lead-grey clouds.

Artillery his men are used to; you hope it’s aimed elsewhere and take your chances. But if one of the drones circling overhead decides to target the crew, they will have little chance of survival.

In his hand, Vitaliy clutches the drone monitor, a £200 device first handed to employees last autumn. Its beeps - now sporadic - will become a single, high-pitched scream if a drone approaches, providing seconds of warning to take cover.

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become ever-present more than 10km behind the trenches in both directions, making the front line perilously difficult to reach, or leave. In response, Kyiv’s military planners are attempting to reduce the amount of men sent through this lethal “grey zone” and replace them, where possible, with machines.

But DTEK power company’s work regularly takes it into the zone.

To reach the damaged cables, Vitaliy drives in his armoured Land Cruiser and instructs The Telegraph to be ready to jump out of the door. “There is a surveillance drone 400m from the car,” he says, as the beeps from the monitor get louder. “It’s following us.”

The car turns into a corridor of anti-drone netting that has been recently erected over the “road of death” into Poksrovsk, the city at the crux of Russia’s summer offensive. The webbing is flimsy, albeit strong enough to entangle a light drone before it explodes.

By the side of the road, soldiers fix a gap made by a recent artillery strike as one watches the sky with an anti-drone gun.

UAVs – be it suicide, bomber or fibre-optic – cause around 70 per cent of all casualties in the war in Ukraine. Troops can no longer be safely transported to their positions inside armoured vehicles, a point one soldier illustrates with images of wrecked MaxxPro MRAPs on his phone.

In one of the pictures, a charred torso lies face down in the blackened dust, arms flung into the air either side of its helmet. Evacuation is equally perilous and infantry now spend longer in their dugouts, unwilling to risk any journey unless it is absolutely necessary.

In Dobropillia, one of the last towns en route to Pokrovsk, soldiers in uniform relax in cafes beyond the reach of the drones. A recruitment billboard shows the pilot of a first-person-view (FPV) drone standing back-to-back with an Iron Man-like robot, shielded by armour on all sides. “We will give you the innovations to stop the enemy,” promises the 1st brigade.

While soldiers who used to fire stingers or mortars retrain as drone pilots, Kyiv is also pioneering the use of robots that can travel across the ground, delivering supplies, retrieving the dead and, on occasion, carrying out attacks.

“We need to replace soldiers with robots,” Col Pavlo Khazan told his superiors in a 2023 presentation. Ukraine, he argued, could not match Russia’s recruitment level, which is now around 8,000 soldiers per month. Nor does it treat its men like “cans of meat” to be frittered away in suicidal assaults.

One general told him he had ideas above his station, but the principle was endorsed by Gen Valery Zaluzhny, the former commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian army.

Today, drones mean that fewer men are needed to hold the line on parts of the front, says Col Khazan, a former unmanned systems commander now serving in the field of electronic warfare. “My grandfather used to be an artilleryman in the Second World War,” he adds. “I have deep respect for the artillery and infantry.”

But drones are cheaper than artillery and require fewer operators. “We are well on the way” to an army of machines, he says, speculating on a future where drone swarms – not men – bear the brunt of assaults.

On his last deployment, Ivan walked 8km (4.9 miles) to his position. The unit travelled at dawn, hoping to avoid the Russian drone pilots, who he says “work mostly at night”. The team crept through the flat, tree-lined landscape, around 10 metres apart. Any closer would have made them an easy target; any further apart risks the lives of the wounded. The march was heart-pounding.

Not far from his dugout, the 21-year-old machine gunner with the Da Vinci Wolves set up an automatic MK19 grenade launcher. “We killed two a few days ago,” he says in between drags of a cigarette. The commander spotted a Russian advance and told the unit to raise their drone. Watching on his monitor, Ivan clicked on the soldiers’ heads and the gun fired two 40mm grenades. “Pof,” he says, slapping his skull emphatically. At the beginning of the war, the MK19 had a margin of error of 20 metres but with the drone it is more precise.

“If I tell you [why I’m in this unit], they’ll definitely say video games cause violence,” Ivan says with a smile before listing his favourites: Minecraft, Stalker, World of Tanks. His friends have joined the same unit, which specialises in robotic platforms. “We drank. We signed up. I’m standing here,” he says, gesturing to a dark hangar full of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVSs). He will return to the front next week.

Ukraine has stabilised the lines around Pokrovsk since the turn of the year. The Russian army, blocked at the entrance to the city, is attempting a pincer movement. Magyar’s Birds, one of Ukraine’s elite drone units, has helped to slow their advances by picking off troops and supply lines up to 20km (12.4 miles) behind the front.

Earlier this month, Robert “Magyar” Brovdi, the newly promoted commander of Ukraine’s unmanned systems forces, reorganised the reward system for confirmed kills to prioritise Russian drone operators. But Vladimir Putin is expected to throw more resources at the city, which would give Moscow a crucial foothold in its attempt to seize the entire Donetsk region.

As the DTEK electricians work in the village near Pokrovsk, a group of residents gather by the roadside. Only 300 remain from a pre-war population 10 times the size. Most lack the funds to flee. Without electricity, the villagers are unable to draw clean water from their well. Food is scarce.

On the other side of the road, a graveyard stretches through un-mown grass that rustles in the wind. Ambulance services and undertakers will not come here, so residents are forced to bury the dead themselves. Makeshift wooden crosses mark the more recent graves.

“It’s nerve-wracking,” says a tall, thin man in a gilet and black tracksuit. “There was a time when there weren’t any drones, but now they’re here every single day.” Only last week, a team of five Russian saboteurs was killed in the village.

One of the DTEK employees is up a ladder resting against a pylon when – around 10 minutes after Ukrainian fire – the Russians launch a return volley. Four whoomphs can be heard in succession. “Guided bombs,” mutters Vitaliy, “closer and closer”.

“Can you see the mushroom clouds?” he asks the worker up the ladder, who pokes his head up to take a look. “No,” he replies. Unlike last Thursday, they will not have to abandon the job and take cover. At a nearby substation, the power to the village is turned on again. “On to the next one,” says Vitaliy, opening the car door to listen as another Himars flies overhead.

Wednesday, July 2, 2025

Ruben Amorim’s honesty has cost Man Utd millions

 Earlier this week, one of the seemingly billions of Manchester United social media fan accounts posted a list of players and their reported asking prices: Anthony Elanga, Joao Pedro, Jamie Bynoe-Gittens. “If that’s what these cost, how much is Garnacho worth?” was the accompanying question.

It’s a rhetorical question you read and hear a lot. To which the answer is always the same and almost always lost in the noise: the agreed point between whatever any buying club is prepared to pay and what any selling club is prepared to accept. This is the only transfer window golden rule.

Alejandro Garnacho is one quarter of the Manchester United Four. The group contains two once-heralded academy graduates (Garnacho and Marcus Rashford) and two wingers (Antony and Jadon Sancho) signed for fees totalling roughly £160m. All four are personae non grata. All four are not just available, but have been placed on the front lawn with sale signs. Terms and conditions apply.

These four also share something else: accused attitude problems during their time at Old Trafford. Three of the four were left out of matchday squads by Ruben Amorim. They have been cast as wastrels, allowing their talent and potential to seep away. Caveat: during loan spells at Aston Villa, Real Betis and Chelsea last season, nobody once mentioned attitude issues.

If that reflects badly upon the individuals, what does it say about Manchester United too? Has any other top-flight club ever had four high-profile first-team players, all senior internationals, so publicly frozen out at once and thus made so explicitly available for sale or loan? None of this is normal.

The Manchester United Four are the work of Amorim and his intended cleansing of the culture within a once broken (still broken?) club. His strategy is one of decisiveness and honesty, presumably because he figures that is the only way to wade through murky water. We cannot move forward until this type of player, or perhaps even this type of person, leaves. Despite his own underperformance (and he’s been farcically honest about this too), Amorim has been afforded the luxury of power.

Among most supporters, Amorim’s approach has been popular. You can see the point: United have been so terrible vs historical expectations for so long that reconstructing a coherent, healthy culture is viewed as a necessary component of change for the better. If that means shedding those whose baggage may make it more difficult, so be it. If it’s expensive, they have seen so many millions leave to the benefit of the Glazer family that they do not care.

Towards the players, that mood continues. The onus, fans feel, is on them. There is a World Cup next summer and all presumably harbour some hopes of reclaiming or keeping their place (although that’s probably not true of Sancho). It’s your own time you’re wasting, guys. That feeling has only been propelled by reports that all four will be omitted from the club’s preseason tour in the US.

But Manchester United have a problem too. They need a rebuild; that is no secret. Amorim would quite like his signings to be in place for the start of the preseason tour, but as yet only Matheus Cunha’s arrival has been confirmed. There are conflicting reports on the PSR wiggle room, but at best we can be sure that the nature of the outgoing deals (prices, sale vs loan) will impact their transfer budgets this summer.



Universe may have started inside black hole, not from Big Bang

 The universe may not have begun with the Big Bang as is generally thought but from the collapse of a massive black hole, a new theory suggests.

Current observations of our universe appear to support the Big Bang and cosmic inflation theories, which say that the early universe sprang into existence from a singular moment in space and time and rapidly blew up in size. The theories, however, leave many fundamental questions unanswered.

For one, in the Big Bang model, the universe begins with a singularity, a point of infinite density where the laws of physics break down, making it difficult to understand what existed before the beginning. Two, after the explosion, the universe is said to have undergone accelerating expansion powered by yet unknown forces with strange properties.

That is to say this model of cosmology explains the origin of the universe by introducing new forces and factors that have never been directly observed while still not explaining where everything came from.

The new theory, described recently in the journal Physical Review D, probes what happens when the early universe’s dense collection of matter collapses under gravity instead of tracing back how it all began.

This is a process similar to what happens when stars collapse into black holes, but exactly what is inside these dense cosmic entities remains a mystery.

Current theories state that, under typical conditions, the collapse of extremely dense matter inevitably leads to a singularity.

But how exactly the rules of quantum mechanics, which dictate the behaviour of tiny particles, apply at the ultrasmall scales of a singularity is unknown.

The new theory proposes that a gravitational collapse does not necessarily have to end in a singularity. It uses mathematical equations to show a collapsing cloud of matter can become extremely dense and then “bounce” and rebound outward into a new expanding phase.

“The bounce is not only possible, it’s inevitable under the right conditions,” study author Enrique Gaztanaga writes in The Conversation.

“The cosmological implication of this new approach is a novel understanding of the origin of the universe that emerges from the collapse and subsequent bounce of a spherically symmetric matter distribution.”

The theory combines the framework of general relativity, which applies to largescale cosmic objects like stars and galaxies, with the principles of quantum mechanics that dictate how tiny atoms and particles behave.

Crucially, it explains an early state universe without implying the existence of mysterious forces.

The new theory is also testable as it predicts that the universe is not flat but slightly curved like the surface of the Earth, researchers say.

If future observations can confirm that the shape of the universe indeed has a small curvature, it could suggest that it all began from a bounce.

“The smoking gun for our bouncing scenario is the presence of a small spatial curvature,” researchers write.

Scientists hope further development of the theory can shed more light on current cosmic mysteries like the origin of monster black holes, the nature of dark matter, and factors influencing the evolution of galaxies.

“The black hole universe also offers a new perspective on our place in the cosmos,” Dr Gaztanaga writes. “In this framework, our entire observable universe lies inside the interior of a black hole formed in some larger ‘parent’ universe.”